Hello, Kansas?
Wichita Eagle | Teen-sex decision next week, judge says
Families who believe that some things are better kept private have to be in shock that the future of their family's privacy is in the hands of a federal judge. I cannot believe it. What are they putting in the water over there in Kansas? I grew up in Kansas; I would have never imagined that someday in the future the state would want gynecological records of a minor if they didn't conform to "virginal" standards. I could not agree more with this editorial:
Kline values girls' privacy less than boys'
This is utter crap, and if I were still a Kansas tax-payer, I would be furious that my money was being spent on this sexist, anti-privacy litigation.
I believe that girls should be prudent in their early sexual life, but that is the sole burden of the parents and the family. There is no reason for anyone else to become involved, especially government.
Families who believe that some things are better kept private have to be in shock that the future of their family's privacy is in the hands of a federal judge. I cannot believe it. What are they putting in the water over there in Kansas? I grew up in Kansas; I would have never imagined that someday in the future the state would want gynecological records of a minor if they didn't conform to "virginal" standards. I could not agree more with this editorial:
Kline values girls' privacy less than boys'
This is utter crap, and if I were still a Kansas tax-payer, I would be furious that my money was being spent on this sexist, anti-privacy litigation.
I believe that girls should be prudent in their early sexual life, but that is the sole burden of the parents and the family. There is no reason for anyone else to become involved, especially government.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home